• Opinion-lead

    Happy Birthday to us!

Opinion

Opinion: As It's Nice That turns six, here's some things we know...

Posted by Rob Alderson,

This week editor Rob Alderson celebrates It’s Nice That’s sixth birthday with six musings about online art and design publishing. As ever you can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

On Wednesday this week we turned six, although embarrassingly we only realised this when someone sent us a nice card congratulating us on the milestone. We’re not massive ones for navel-gazing, but it did give us pause to reflect on where we’ve come from and where we might be going, and so in no particular order, here’s some things I thought were worth sharing…

There was no grand plan behind It’s Nice That

We get asked a lot about this, and the story about how Will Hudson founded the site as a student at Brighton University has been trotted out numerous times. But for me it remains one of our greatest strengths – we are able to be agile and nimble and take decisions based on what feels right at any particular time.

Getting bigger brings its own problems

The site now goes out to about 350,000 people a month, generating about 1.75 million page views. The flip-side of this growth – tied in with the sheer amount of content we post – is that some people won’t like certain things we are keen to showcase. And increasingly they are quick to let us know, which we welcome – we are always happy to explain why we think something deserved a place on the site.

And that’s why we don’t have comments

I would say one of the most common questions I’m asked is why we don’t have comments on the site. The answer is twofold – one; I am yet to be convinced that in the main, comments on art and design articles really evolve into genuinely enlightening debate, most of it tends fall into the “That’s lovely/That’s sh*t” categories. And two; we are worried that having comments on every post – and the ensuing negativity that often ensues – undermines the whole upbeat, enthusiastic tone we have built the site around. We are proud that we curate a little corner of the internet that is completely positive.

Quality control is imperative

Without this, the whole thing comes crashing down. People trust us to curate interesting, exciting and engaging creative work and we take that responsibility very seriously. Every post that goes up on the site is discussed among the entire editorial team, work is frequently challenged and a huge amount of things we are sent don’t make the cut.

It’s very important to practise what you preach

When we redesigned It’s Nice That a year ago we were very aware that our entire audience was going to have an opinion above and beyond the first reactions – a design-savvy community is always going to react to a redesign in a different way. That aesthetic consciousness has to permeate everything we produce across all our platforms. I don’t understand design blogs that are not nice to look at.

Standing still is not for us

In the past few weeks we’ve relaunched our magazine, Student of the Month and our London listings guide This At There. Before that there was the podcast, the Introducing… feature and these Opinion slots. We firmly believe you have to evolve or die. We’re super proud of what we’ve achieved in the past six years, but this is just the start.

So over to you – what do you want to see from It’s Nice That in the next six years? What do you like about the site? What are you not so keen on?

comments powered by Disqus
Ra

Posted by Rob Alderson

Editor-in-Chief Rob oversees editorial across all three It’s Nice That platforms; online, print and events. He has a background in newspaper journalism and a particular interest in art, advertising and photography. He is the main host of the Studio Audience podcast.

Most Recent: Opinion View Archive

  1. List

    Last week features editor Liv Siddall put out a call to arms to the illustration community, inviting practitioners young and old to push their discipline further and keep their work exciting and fresh. She cited in particular the regurgitation of the same established names at illustration fairs and events as a cynical way to flog tickets and boost sales instead of creating a platform for new, innovative work.

  2. Main

    This week, Features Editor Liv Siddall wonders whether the world of illustration, and the events that champion them, have perhaps become a bit stale. And maybe we should take steps to champion as many new and exciting artists as possible, as opposed to falling back on the same names time and time again.

  3. List

    This week Rob Alderson welcomes the excellent Dazed 100 list of defining creative pioneers but wonders why readers are being asked to help rank the entries. As ever you can join the debate using the comment thread below….

  4. Opinion-list-new

    This week It’s Nice That director Will Hudson talks about why he reckons the new Randall Wright-directed documentary Hockney is so brilliant. You can let us know your thoughts in the comment thread below.

  5. Opinion-list

    This week assistant editor Maisie Skidmore asks what it is about weekly podcast Serial that has got the whole world talking. As ever, we want to hear what you think! Add your two pennies in the comment thread below.

  6. List

    This week Rob Alderson examines Paper Magazine’s attempts to “break the internet” with their nude Kim Kardashian photoshoot. He asks if it’s actually a good cover, and what (if anything) it tells us about the magazine industry. As ever you can add your thoughts below…

  7. List

    Ahead of a panel discussion we’re hosting at London College of Communication next week we’re keen to explore whether the gap between design schools and the creative industries is a problem that needs addressing. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  8. List

    In a special Opinion piece, Rob Alderson explains why the closure of London’s Kemistry Gallery is a cause for concern, but why its ambitious future plans need to be encouraged. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  9. Lead

    This week online editor Emily Gosling looks at who can really claim authorship of artworks created using technology designed by someone else. Who can really take the credit for art that might not be possible without the tech know-how of others?

  10. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on an interesting blog by Chloe Markowicz which suggests that people are ashamed to call what they do advertising. As ever you can join the debate and add your comments using the discussion thread below.

  11. Main

    Wake up! Freshers’ Week is done – all that colourful IKEA kitchenware your mum got you is nowhere to be seen and you’ve gained 478 new friends on Facebook and an awkward conversation with your home friends about who you’re actually going to Glastonbury with next year. To be honest, being a fresher usually goes on for way longer than a week. After a month or so of partying and drinking Glenn’s Vodka and Robinson’s out of tupperware bowls you wake up with a whole load of briefs to tackle and studio space and equipment to fight over. This is the START of ART SCHOOL.

  12. List

    In recent months the question of so-called spec work has been raised with us over social media in light of various design competitions we have helped promote. Off the back of that we have spent a lot of time discussing this thorny issue with various people so as to formulate a consistent approach, although the nature of these things is that each is best analysed on a case by case basis.

  13. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on the launch of the new Design Museum website and the strange suggestion that the redesign should have been given to a British agency rather than Dutch studio Fabrique. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below…