• Opinion-lead
Opinion

Opinion: Richard van der Laken on why The Era of The Designer should begin now

Posted by It's Nice That,

This week Richard van der Laken, director of What Design Can Do?, which takes place in Amsterdam on Thursday and Friday, issues a call to arms for The Era of The Designer to begin…

It is time designers regain control over their own profession again. Their profession isn’t just about beauty and aesthetics. It’s also about proposing alternatives, charting new avenues, coming up with solutions for pressing social issues both large and small, breaking taboos. It is about deeds, not words; reasons why designers should take over from the administrators and start shaping their own sector themselves.

Since I started What Design Can Do, I often find myself talking to people about what exactly design is.

Well, everything is design. Except nature of course, although creationists might challenge me on that. Everything that man has touched is, in essence, designed.

On that basis, we can establish that the society in which we live is design, and that we cannot overestimate the importance of designers. That’s why the increasing emphasis placed on the creative sector in Europe is enormously welcome. In the Netherlands, the creative sector has even been identified as a spearhead of economic policy.

The more the creative sector is stimulated, the better I think it is. Creative thinking has so much to offer the world. Designers can contribute to many more fields than those with which they are traditionally associated. And demonstrating that was one of the reasons for initiating the What Design Can Do conference.

What strikes me in this context is that in the many advisory and implementation bodies set up to carry out this incentives policy, professional administrators take decisions on behalf of the creative sector. The same is true when it comes to design education. In many cases, designers are simply passive onlookers. This is astonishing, because space for personal development and unbridled creation is precisely what should set the tone in the creative sector.

Maybe it is going too far to demand that designers rule the world, although I would like to witness that happening. But at least allow designers to shape their own sector themselves. If the government really wants to take the creative sector seriously, then designers should be in control.

There is every reason for a reappraisal. The crisis that has reigned for five years has also shaken designers into life. Things will never be as they were. And that irrevocably raises a couple of existential questions. Why do I do the things I do? What have I to offer? How can I change things for the better?

Designers are posing those questions more and more often. Their profession isn’t just about beauty and aesthetics. It’s also about proposing alternatives, charting new avenues, coming up with solutions for pressing social issues both large and small, breaking taboos. It is about deeds, not words.

The beauty of it all is that designers are doers. It is in their genes. For designers, a problem amounts to an invitation, a taboo is a challenge. Designers combine conceptual and abstract thinking with idealistic visions and practical feasibility.

Everything is design. So perhaps the era of The Designer, in capitals, is now upon us. The era in which designers themselves gain control of and shape their sector. And, in the process, they can change society in partnership with government, trade and industry, consumers, users and the public. We are ready for the challenge.

comments powered by Disqus
Nice

Posted by It's Nice That

The It’s Nice That byline is used on posts that relate to the site in general, specific announcements or pieces where there is no clear single author. Contact us using the email address below if you have questions, feedback or complaints.

Most Recent: Opinion View Archive

  1. List

    Last week features editor Liv Siddall put out a call to arms to the illustration community, inviting practitioners young and old to push their discipline further and keep their work exciting and fresh. She cited in particular the regurgitation of the same established names at illustration fairs and events as a cynical way to flog tickets and boost sales instead of creating a platform for new, innovative work.

  2. Main

    This week, Features Editor Liv Siddall wonders whether the world of illustration, and the events that champion them, have perhaps become a bit stale. And maybe we should take steps to champion as many new and exciting artists as possible, as opposed to falling back on the same names time and time again.

  3. List

    This week Rob Alderson welcomes the excellent Dazed 100 list of defining creative pioneers but wonders why readers are being asked to help rank the entries. As ever you can join the debate using the comment thread below….

  4. Opinion-list-new

    This week It’s Nice That director Will Hudson talks about why he reckons the new Randall Wright-directed documentary Hockney is so brilliant. You can let us know your thoughts in the comment thread below.

  5. Opinion-list

    This week assistant editor Maisie Skidmore asks what it is about weekly podcast Serial that has got the whole world talking. As ever, we want to hear what you think! Add your two pennies in the comment thread below.

  6. List

    This week Rob Alderson examines Paper Magazine’s attempts to “break the internet” with their nude Kim Kardashian photoshoot. He asks if it’s actually a good cover, and what (if anything) it tells us about the magazine industry. As ever you can add your thoughts below…

  7. List

    Ahead of a panel discussion we’re hosting at London College of Communication next week we’re keen to explore whether the gap between design schools and the creative industries is a problem that needs addressing. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  8. List

    In a special Opinion piece, Rob Alderson explains why the closure of London’s Kemistry Gallery is a cause for concern, but why its ambitious future plans need to be encouraged. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  9. Lead

    This week online editor Emily Gosling looks at who can really claim authorship of artworks created using technology designed by someone else. Who can really take the credit for art that might not be possible without the tech know-how of others?

  10. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on an interesting blog by Chloe Markowicz which suggests that people are ashamed to call what they do advertising. As ever you can join the debate and add your comments using the discussion thread below.

  11. Main

    Wake up! Freshers’ Week is done – all that colourful IKEA kitchenware your mum got you is nowhere to be seen and you’ve gained 478 new friends on Facebook and an awkward conversation with your home friends about who you’re actually going to Glastonbury with next year. To be honest, being a fresher usually goes on for way longer than a week. After a month or so of partying and drinking Glenn’s Vodka and Robinson’s out of tupperware bowls you wake up with a whole load of briefs to tackle and studio space and equipment to fight over. This is the START of ART SCHOOL.

  12. List

    In recent months the question of so-called spec work has been raised with us over social media in light of various design competitions we have helped promote. Off the back of that we have spent a lot of time discussing this thorny issue with various people so as to formulate a consistent approach, although the nature of these things is that each is best analysed on a case by case basis.

  13. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on the launch of the new Design Museum website and the strange suggestion that the redesign should have been given to a British agency rather than Dutch studio Fabrique. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below…