• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Lj_big
Film

Little Joe

Posted by Charlotte Simmonds,

Little Joe calls itself a magazine about “queers and cinema, mostly”. It’s a little bit quirky, a little bit racey, and more than a little bit engrossing. The book-sized journal digests queer cinema with flair and insight, with an emphasis on the nostalgic rather than the contemporary. Only three issues deep, these guys are already producing vanguard content and pulling excellent interviews out of cult icons like George Kuchar and David DeCoteau. It’s a product of obvious enthusiasm for the subject, and we chatted with co-founders Sam Ashby and Michael Pierce to get the scoop on what Little Joe is all about.

Little Joe does a brilliant job of filling an un-filled niche. When, why and how did you guys start up the magazine? What did you want it to stand for, or provide, that wasn’t out there already?

SA: Little Joe began as a drunken idea, late one summer evening during a screening of Andy Warhol and Paul Morrissey’s Flesh. It was the sight of actor Joe Dallesandro laying face down, naked on the bed and the realisation that there was no other magazine out there discussing these kinds of films. From that point on, I set about trying to craft a magazine that would inspire the deep (and not so deep) personal connections with films – much like an older, more experienced friend giving you a stash of films that would alter your perceptions of the world. It took me two years to put the first issue together…

MP: I met Sam whilst he was drinking the free bar dry at the BFI London Lesbian & Gay Film Festival launch party in 2010, and we spent the whole night discussing the pros and cons (mostly cons) of the current ’queer film’ scene and how older films were always the most exciting to discover at festivals. It was only after the hangover wore off, that I remembered him talking about Little Joe and so I managed to convince him to let me be his deputy editor/sidekick. For me, Little Joe is about turning away from the fetishisation of the new, and instead placing the emphasis on what we share and connect with in the past, without overdosing on nostalgia.

What were your backgrounds in terms of film, writing, etc.? How have your roots informed the direction you’ve taken the magazine in?

SA: Film has long been a huge part of my life and I briefly studied some film history before falling into graphic design and specialising in designing film posters. I don’t think that has necessarily informed the direction of the magazine though, which seems like more of a strange compulsion, a need to create something that didn’t already exist. I think my untrained approach affords a certain breadth and comfort with the high and the low which Little Joe celebrates. It’s a process which allows me to discover all these things for myself thanks to our very generous contributors, and it is that need to discover which drives it and keeps us going.

MP: I come from a film exhibition background, having worked for film festivals and independent cinemas, and so I enjoy getting my hands dirty finding obscure films and then showing them to an audience who are open minded/stoned enough to go with my particular interests. One thing we do each magazine is an index of films and their availability to remind ourselves that even now, when it’s easy to believe that everything is or will eventually be online, there are still a great deal of films unavailable to view and that, without intervention, could be lost.

Where did the inspiration for the magazine’s design come from? Did you have strong ideas about how Little Joe had to appear or visually appeal to its readers?

SA: I’ve always had a fetish for magazines and a few years ago began collecting old queer zines. I love the home-made aesthetic, the feel of the personal. This definitely applied to the first issue which was my very first attempt at designing a magazine, so that one definitely feels zine-y. Issue No. 2 was more directly inspired by Amos Vogel’s book Film as a Subversive Art which makes extensive use of Gill Sans Ultra which just so happened to be the font I used for our logo.

No. 3 is cleaner and more rigidly designed, and more confident, I hope. I always wanted the magazine to feel familiar to its readers, like it had been on your bookshelf for years, and the small size adds to that while allowing it to be carried and shared more easily. It also feels like a dodgy old pulp novel, so there is the suggestion of something forbidden, taboo, which I love. I don’t think I’ll ever want each issue to look the same, but there are elements that carry throughout, such as the use of two colours, and the inclusion of little supplements which allow us to really experiment beyond the confines of the magazine.

Does queerness mean, in a Little Joe context, something broader than just sexual orientation? If so, what?

SA: It is absolutely broader, yes. When I thought up the subheading “a magazine about queers and cinema, mostly” to describe our focus, I was using the term “queer” in the more archaic sense, a way to describe someone that did not fit in, was different somehow, as well as nodding towards the more appropriate contemporary meaning which is more plural. Neither does not necessarily have to relate to sexuality. I find so many of these other definitions around sexuality restrictive, but using "queer” is a way to celebrate that dissidence.

MP: I think queerness has always transcended simple tick box style definitions of sexual orientation. It’s gone through so many permutations of meaning and I realise for a certain generation, it still has a very painful association, but I hope people can use it however they want, not just to define or empower themselves but to coin a way of activist thinking, going against the grain and ignoring popularity.

We’re well impressed with what you’ve managed to pull off in three issue. Where are you looking to take things next? Who would you most love to get your hands on for an interview?

SA: January sees the launch of our Little Film Club, a monthly screening programme alternating between The Cinema Museum in Kennington and The Rio in Dalston. We are excited to build on the community that has emerged around the magazine and provide a new space for engaging, unexpected discussion.

MP: We really hope it will develop into an inclusive club where people feel they can make suggestions and pitch ideas, much like how we put the magazine together.

SA: We will also begin work on No. 4 imminently, so we are very keen to discover where this strange journey will take us next. As for dream interviewees, there are so many: Udo Kier, Ulrike Ottinger, Tilda Swinton…

Portrait11

Posted by Charlotte Simmonds

Californian Charlotte joined us as an editorial intern after studying at New York university and London Metropolitan University. She wrote for the site between January and March 2012.

Most Recent: Film View Archive

  1. Dhmis-int-1

    PESKY BEE! Today is the day fans all over the world wring their little tiny/big hairy hands together for: the day when a new episode of Don’t Hug me I’m Scared is released! Did you know that the first episode of Don’t Hug Me I’m Scared has over 24 million views on YouTube? With that many fans to please, Becky and Joe have been working overtime on this one, collaborating with a bunch of new people as you’ll see in the increasingly lengthy credits at the abrupt end.

  2. Camille-summers-valli-int-list

    “Their agenda is that they want an activist film that goes into the history of their struggle and presents a contemporary portrait of what’s happening in Black Mesa right now. But it’s not an activist film. I think ultimately it has undertones of activism because of the subject matter, but an activist film follows a certain structure and I’m definitely moving more towards something else.”

  3. Tim-brown-int-list

    As a one-time news journalist (albeit at a very low level) I have a real affinity for reportage illustrators. George Butler is one of the best around and this new film by Tim Brown which follows him on a three-week trip to Afghanistan provides a great insight into his finely-honed talents. On his first trip to the war-torn country George was embedded with British troops, but he hungered to draw the locals whose lives had been so irrevocably changed over recent years. “I was always aware that over the walls there were millions of people getting on with their lives,” he says.

  4. Liamsaintpierre-dominicwilcox-int-list

    We have often spoken about the difficulties of films profiling creative figures and the disappointment when they fall back on familiar and formulaic tropes. This film from Liam Saint Pierre though shows how it should be done. It helps of course that his subject – the artist and designer Dominic Wilcox – is so interesting and directs his razor-sharp creative mind into all manner of silly inventions. “Let’s do the ridiculous and by doing the ridiculous something else might come of it,” says Dominic at one point in a line that could be his mantra.

  5. Annaginsburg-int-list

    I can imagine that pitching for music videos can be a really interesting process: “Well, we’re going to dress her up in an outfit made of dog treats and hot dog sausages, and have her run around in an underground carpark with two massive Alsatians.”

  6. Marianna-simnett_-'blood'-2015.-produced-as-part-of-the-jerwood-fvu-awards-2015_-what-will-they-see-of-me-(7)-int

    People crawling into a huge pair of nostrils, middle-aged virgins and the power-play of a hotel room feature in some very strange but utterly captivating video works from Lucy Clout and Marianna Simnett, who scooped the 2015 Jerwood/Film and Video Umbrella Award.

  7. Photoshop-shot-3-int_copy

    Adobe Photoshop has turned 25 – happy belated birthday Photoshop! To celebrate this momentous occasion, CreativeLive, who run live software training workshops online, asked eight Photoshop experts to try out the 1.0 version. Time has flown by, and Photoshop 1.0 looks ridiculous. It’s kind of like MS Paint and is akin watching a child or a grandparent trying to even switch on a computer, but backwards. Who knew that watching people try to add drop shadows to bacon and freaking out not being able to “undo” could be so entertaining.

  8. Rr-oakland-home-int

    Produced by Levi’s Skateboarding, director Ryan Reichenfeld’s Skateboarding in Oakland follows a group of friends who skate around Oakland and its renewed Town Park Skate Park. The film focusses on the voices of Lemuel West and Terrell Newell, who have lost both friends and family often down to the gang culture that thrives in Oakland and its suburbs. They and their friends, having grown up under similar circumstances, see their skate community as a relief from this and an opportunity to extract themselves from potentially destructive lifestyles. Ryan describes Skateboarding in Oakland as “not a story about surviving tough circumstances in a harsh environment, [but] a story about perspective and thriving in the face of it all.”

  9. Bob-benedict-cock-robin-int-lis

    I don’t know what I was expecting when I sat down to watch Cock Robin, the first film by newly-formed direction duo BobBenedict to see the light, but it certainly wasn’t the intense wave of emotion, humour, and the slick, charismatic production that hit me when I pressed play. The pair, formed of photographer Benedict Morgan (who was responsible for this astounding project) and production designer Sean Hogan (or Bob), re-worked the classic nursery rhyme Who Killed Cock Robin? with a perfectly briefed cast of actors. What’s more, the lot was filmed at the Mansfield Indoor Bowling Club, a distinctly familiar and achingly kitsch location which has since sadly made way for a luxury housing development. The setting absolutely makes the film, elevating the idea to the realm of a finely-polished and well-loved 1970s British TV show rather than a short film.

  10. Skrillex-doompy-poomp-int-list

    Fleur & Manu’s latest video for everyone’s favourite ex-goth Skrillex is a bit of a repetitive tale. It takes the form of a mulleted dropout failing to get a loan from his bank, and then having to relive the painful experience again and again, Groundhog Day-style until he loses his shit completely and the whole thing descends into a cross-dressing, semi-naked musical. There are some great hairy backs thrown into the mix too. With a synopsis like that how could you resist?

  11. Daniel-swan-django-django-list

    Four years after first discovering Daniel Swan’s website he’s still not bothered to put any work on it. There’s just a 3D-rendered glittery keyring that bears his name and serves as his calling card. He’s a confident man! Still, when you’re producing work as good as Daniel, you can afford to be confident. Last time we had him up on the site he had collaborated with David Rudnick on an incredible desert apocalypse for RL Grime, and this latest offering for Django Django is no less impressive.

  12. Fyi-still-11-int_copy

    In response to a “critical graphic design” brief from their tutor at Central Saint Martins, graphic design students Ellen Mercer and Lucy Streule spliced together a tonne of clips and heartfelt scenes where movie characters let each other know, “FYI I’m a graphic designer.”

  13. Crane-oscars-int-list

    There’s always a frenzy of opinions around the Oscars, as Michael Hogan Tweeted this morning: “It’s all happening over on the #oscars hashtag, if you’re interested in people who can’t type properly quacking on about film awards.” But amid all the polarised bickering and the dress-sense-rating bitchiness, it’s nice to remember the sheer amount of skill and craft that went into all the nominated films. Crane.tv has produced an interesting series which focuses on the lesser-appreciated talents who make the movie industry what it is, the most impressive of which focuses on the Whiplash sound mixer Thomas Curley. He got the nod from the Academy this year and it’s super interesting to hear him talk about the challenges of working on a film which is all about drumming, and so sound is critically important to the overall artistic effect.