• Lead
Opinion

James Cartwright and Rob Alderson debate Fabrice Le Nezet's fake project

Posted by James Cartwright,

Last week we were duped into running a project on the site that turned out to be a hoax. Here Rob Alderson explains what happened and why it’s left an unsavoury taste, while James Cartwright disagrees and congratulates the artist on a spoof well done. As ever you can leave your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

Rob Alderson

Last week It’s Nice That covered Fabrice Le Nezet’s “new sculpture” at an east London station. My colleague Amy Lewin wrote the piece but I brought it to our weekly editorial meeting and I pushed for it to be published on the site. I got done like a kipper.

Fabrice is a sculptor who has been on the site before; we even included his work in our first ever It’s Nice That Annual. I love the way his pieces explore tension, pushing materials to what seem to be their physical limits as they teeter on the edge of collapse. So I was excited to learn that he’d created a set of four new sculptures in Dalston Junction station and eager that we cover them.

In reality, there was no such sculpture. Fabrice claims that what started out as a real project evolved into something else during the planning phase. “While working on it, it came to me that this project was raising some questions and interrogation. What are the credibility of the pictures in a society in which most of the art pieces are seen through a screen? Does a sculpture have less value because it’s made digitally?”

So the work was disseminated and various blogs and websites fell for it hook, line and sinker. It’s particularly embarrassing for us because Dalston Junction is only about 15 minutes’ walk from our studio. But had we heard about this project in San Francisco, or Buenos Aries, I would never have considered dispatching someone to check it was actually there.

Also we didn’t just see something pretty online and throw it up on our site no questions asked. We did ask questions; we interviewed Fabrice about how the pieces were made and the public’s reaction. The question we never asked was: “Does this really exist?” But when would we ever?

If this sounds like sour grapes then I suppose in part it is. To carry on lying when someone takes the time to find out more about the project seems like an unfair extension of the original ideas he was exploring. I’m a little less trusting than I once was, and I am not sure that’s a good thing.

James Cartwright

First and foremost I’d like to congratulate Fabrice for having the balls to undertake a piece like this. As someone who specialises in ACTUAL sculptural commissions it seems like a daring move to change the rationale behind your practice and attempt to push it in a new direction; potentially wrestling with new themes and motivations along the way. Taking the decision to trick people with whom you have an existing relationship also requires a lot of nerve. As Rob mentioned above, we featured Fabrice’s work in our 2012 Annual, but perhaps we’ll strike him off future publications for making us feel daft.

Of course we won’t though, because even if we do have egg on our faces after his latest stunt, his ability to conceive of a practical joke like this and then follow it through is undoubtedly worthy of respect.

In terms of motivation Fabrice claims his viral campaign was an attempt to disseminate his ideas online quickly and efficiently, to bypass the red tape involved in such an ambitious public project. To build a real sculpture in Dalston Junction station would take months, if not years of planning, and of course there’s no telling whether the public would engage if it did exist. His film and the resulting press demonstrate that people are interested, that they do care and he can use that as leverage when he finally approaches the station to commission the work.

Then there’s the conceptual part. Fabrice also suggests that he’s questioning the media’s ability to interrogate thoroughly and to present facts to their audiences instead of fabricated fictions. Whether art and design websites are the most guilty of this kind of misinformation is up for debate, but it’s startling to think how often we accept the information we’re given online and in print and allow it to shape our own world views – whether it’s a fake sculpture or a doctored image of a war zone.

It’s in this area that I have the most respect for Fabrice, and have to applaud him for raising our awareness of our own vulnerability to misinformation. Perhaps when we’re covering installations in our own back yard we DO have to be more thorough as a rule. We should go and visit them in person and engage with them physically, otherwise we run the risk of perpetrating the regurgitation of stock imagery online. The fact that Fabrice lied to us is neither here nor there, it was a necessary part of fulfilling his own brief, and a necessary evil to prove his point.

So hats off to you Fabrice. You made us look stupid, but you also made us think about the way we work, and as a result I appreciate your dishonesty!

comments powered by Disqus
Jc

Posted by James Cartwright

James started out as an intern in 2011 and is now one of our two editors. He oversees Printed Pages magazine and content wise has a special interest in graphic design and illustration. He also runs our online shop Company of Parrots and is a regular on our Studio Audience podcast.

Most Recent: Opinion View Archive

  1. List

    Last week features editor Liv Siddall put out a call to arms to the illustration community, inviting practitioners young and old to push their discipline further and keep their work exciting and fresh. She cited in particular the regurgitation of the same established names at illustration fairs and events as a cynical way to flog tickets and boost sales instead of creating a platform for new, innovative work.

  2. Main

    This week, Features Editor Liv Siddall wonders whether the world of illustration, and the events that champion them, have perhaps become a bit stale. And maybe we should take steps to champion as many new and exciting artists as possible, as opposed to falling back on the same names time and time again.

  3. List

    This week Rob Alderson welcomes the excellent Dazed 100 list of defining creative pioneers but wonders why readers are being asked to help rank the entries. As ever you can join the debate using the comment thread below….

  4. Opinion-list-new

    This week It’s Nice That director Will Hudson talks about why he reckons the new Randall Wright-directed documentary Hockney is so brilliant. You can let us know your thoughts in the comment thread below.

  5. Opinion-list

    This week assistant editor Maisie Skidmore asks what it is about weekly podcast Serial that has got the whole world talking. As ever, we want to hear what you think! Add your two pennies in the comment thread below.

  6. List

    This week Rob Alderson examines Paper Magazine’s attempts to “break the internet” with their nude Kim Kardashian photoshoot. He asks if it’s actually a good cover, and what (if anything) it tells us about the magazine industry. As ever you can add your thoughts below…

  7. List

    Ahead of a panel discussion we’re hosting at London College of Communication next week we’re keen to explore whether the gap between design schools and the creative industries is a problem that needs addressing. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  8. List

    In a special Opinion piece, Rob Alderson explains why the closure of London’s Kemistry Gallery is a cause for concern, but why its ambitious future plans need to be encouraged. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  9. Lead

    This week online editor Emily Gosling looks at who can really claim authorship of artworks created using technology designed by someone else. Who can really take the credit for art that might not be possible without the tech know-how of others?

  10. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on an interesting blog by Chloe Markowicz which suggests that people are ashamed to call what they do advertising. As ever you can join the debate and add your comments using the discussion thread below.

  11. Main

    Wake up! Freshers’ Week is done – all that colourful IKEA kitchenware your mum got you is nowhere to be seen and you’ve gained 478 new friends on Facebook and an awkward conversation with your home friends about who you’re actually going to Glastonbury with next year. To be honest, being a fresher usually goes on for way longer than a week. After a month or so of partying and drinking Glenn’s Vodka and Robinson’s out of tupperware bowls you wake up with a whole load of briefs to tackle and studio space and equipment to fight over. This is the START of ART SCHOOL.

  12. List

    In recent months the question of so-called spec work has been raised with us over social media in light of various design competitions we have helped promote. Off the back of that we have spent a lot of time discussing this thorny issue with various people so as to formulate a consistent approach, although the nature of these things is that each is best analysed on a case by case basis.

  13. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on the launch of the new Design Museum website and the strange suggestion that the redesign should have been given to a British agency rather than Dutch studio Fabrique. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below…