• Opinion-lead

    Opinion: Is Marina Abramović in danger of being seen as a sell-out?

Opinion

Opinion: Is Marina Abramović in danger of being seen as a sell-out?

Posted by Maisie Skidmore,

This week editorial assistant Maisie Skidmore questions whether Marina Abramović’s celebrity collaborations in the run-up to the opening of the Marina Abramović Institute are compromising her reputation as a pioneer of long durational performance art. As ever, you can add your comments in the thread below.

Everybody is talking about Marina Abramović. From Jay Z’s reinterpretation of her iconic piece The Artist is Present earlier this month, in which he performed new song Picasso Baby for six hours straight in a star-studded event at New York’s Pace Gallery, to her rumoured involvement with Lady Gaga’s soon-to-be-released album Artpop, the self-appointed “grandmother of performance art” has been all over the shop of late.

What’s more, with the Marina Abramović Institute – the proposed home of long durational performance – currently being crowdfunded on Kickstarter, there doesn’t seem to be any sign of her scaling things back soon. All of which is pushing some critics to question whether her VIP affiliations and her encouragement of her audience’s desperation to meet her might be threatening to undermine the integrity which has, until now, sustained her reputation as one of the pioneers of the art form.

And a pioneer she most definitely is. From the work she made during her 12-year relationship with fellow performance artist Ulay, to the trailblazing piece The Artist is Present in which she sat in the MOMA for 736 hours engaging members of the general public in mutual gaze, her utilisation of her body as a medium has altered the traditions of performance art, encouraging active participation and provoking questions about the role of the Lacanian gaze in the genre of performance art. So, perhaps the ends she is working to really are concerned with the boundaries of performance.

Still, the means by which she is trying to reach them is certainly furrowing some brows. Late last week, for example, Lady Gaga released a film (NSFW) in which she practises “the Abramović method” at the MAI, posing naked in a forest, pressing crystals against her naked body and calling out for minutes at a time. This isn’t the first time Gaga and Marina have been linked, either; in a fundraising event for the MAI earlier this month Gaga took part in a marathon reading of the 1961 sci-fi work Solaris and the pair spent time together at a benefit in the Hamptons in late July. An unlikely friendship, perhaps, seeing as the video interview in which Gaga first expressed her admiration for Marina was considered by many to prove Gaga’s ignorance more than anything else.

In a further mingling of the ideas of art and celebrity, every backer to pledge $1 or more to the MAI’s Kickstarter will receive “a hug from Marina Abramović” in a live event called The Embrace, bringing to mind rapidly the hype around her MOMA retrospective when audience members queued for days to sit with her.

Being involved with pop culture is one thing, but performing with rappers? Hanging out with Lady Gaga? Offering hugs in exchange for dollars? Something seems to have gone awry, here; Marina’s drastic commercialisation in the run-up to the opening of her institute is more akin to the desperate ploys of an attention-hungry popstar than a pioneering performance artist. Let’s just hope the ends justifies the means.

comments powered by Disqus
Ms-300

Posted by Maisie Skidmore

Assistant Editor Maisie joined It’s Nice That fresh out of university in the summer of 2013 and has stayed with us ever since. She has a particular interest in art, fashion and photography and is a regular on our Studio Audience podcast. She also oversees our London listings guide This At There.

Most Recent: Opinion View Archive

  1. List

    Last week features editor Liv Siddall put out a call to arms to the illustration community, inviting practitioners young and old to push their discipline further and keep their work exciting and fresh. She cited in particular the regurgitation of the same established names at illustration fairs and events as a cynical way to flog tickets and boost sales instead of creating a platform for new, innovative work.

  2. Main

    This week, Features Editor Liv Siddall wonders whether the world of illustration, and the events that champion them, have perhaps become a bit stale. And maybe we should take steps to champion as many new and exciting artists as possible, as opposed to falling back on the same names time and time again.

  3. List

    This week Rob Alderson welcomes the excellent Dazed 100 list of defining creative pioneers but wonders why readers are being asked to help rank the entries. As ever you can join the debate using the comment thread below….

  4. Opinion-list-new

    This week It’s Nice That director Will Hudson talks about why he reckons the new Randall Wright-directed documentary Hockney is so brilliant. You can let us know your thoughts in the comment thread below.

  5. Opinion-list

    This week assistant editor Maisie Skidmore asks what it is about weekly podcast Serial that has got the whole world talking. As ever, we want to hear what you think! Add your two pennies in the comment thread below.

  6. List

    This week Rob Alderson examines Paper Magazine’s attempts to “break the internet” with their nude Kim Kardashian photoshoot. He asks if it’s actually a good cover, and what (if anything) it tells us about the magazine industry. As ever you can add your thoughts below…

  7. List

    Ahead of a panel discussion we’re hosting at London College of Communication next week we’re keen to explore whether the gap between design schools and the creative industries is a problem that needs addressing. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  8. List

    In a special Opinion piece, Rob Alderson explains why the closure of London’s Kemistry Gallery is a cause for concern, but why its ambitious future plans need to be encouraged. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  9. Lead

    This week online editor Emily Gosling looks at who can really claim authorship of artworks created using technology designed by someone else. Who can really take the credit for art that might not be possible without the tech know-how of others?

  10. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on an interesting blog by Chloe Markowicz which suggests that people are ashamed to call what they do advertising. As ever you can join the debate and add your comments using the discussion thread below.

  11. Main

    Wake up! Freshers’ Week is done – all that colourful IKEA kitchenware your mum got you is nowhere to be seen and you’ve gained 478 new friends on Facebook and an awkward conversation with your home friends about who you’re actually going to Glastonbury with next year. To be honest, being a fresher usually goes on for way longer than a week. After a month or so of partying and drinking Glenn’s Vodka and Robinson’s out of tupperware bowls you wake up with a whole load of briefs to tackle and studio space and equipment to fight over. This is the START of ART SCHOOL.

  12. List

    In recent months the question of so-called spec work has been raised with us over social media in light of various design competitions we have helped promote. Off the back of that we have spent a lot of time discussing this thorny issue with various people so as to formulate a consistent approach, although the nature of these things is that each is best analysed on a case by case basis.

  13. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on the launch of the new Design Museum website and the strange suggestion that the redesign should have been given to a British agency rather than Dutch studio Fabrique. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below…