When it was first published in 1996, A Smile in the Mind quickly became a key tome for a generation of designers. Edited by Beryl McAlhone and David Stuart, it made the case for wit and humour in design practice, showing and discussing some of the best projects that had been made at the time.
The book has now been released in an updated, second edition with editors Greg Quinton and Nick Asbury. There are sections on different types of wit, such as ambiguity, substitution and double takes; as well as closer looks at particular designers who employ it in their work, including Saul Bass, Michael Beirut, Sarah Illenberger and Christoph Niemann.
In their preface Greg and Nick describe their impetus for re-publishing the book: “The story of wit in the last 20 years is in fact one of scaling up. As designers have enjoyed access to new technologies and greater freedom to move across disciplinary boundaries, so the realm of wit has become larger, not smaller.”
On the advent of its release, here we publish an extract from A Smile in the Mind, where Seymour Chwast speaks about how he gets ideas, and the role of wit in his work.
“Wit is the way I solve problems. It is a way of thinking that allows me to come up with graphic ideas. Although the wit is there, the work is not necessarily funny. Design is play, and designers use a whole gamut of techniques that could be considered playful. Some are funny: some have serious intent.
I discovered how powerful and serious wit can be when I was in the Czech Republic judging a poster biennale during the Yugoslav Wars of the early 1990s. Two Sarajevo designers were showing about thirty posters, hand drawn, all based on puns and American clichés like Coca-Cola and Andy Warhol’s soup cans. They were presenting the war as totally absurd while living through it at the same time. Their intention was to make people aware of what was happening, but their technique was light and funny.
In my work there is always some sort of graphic play, in that there is an idea which is surprising. Wit usually involves the juxtaposition of elements that do not belong together. I frequently take two points that have to be addressed and combine them in one image. The result may be crazy or surreal, but it makes sense because the subject has both those sides to it. The way I go about it is to fool around with the two elements until the combination makes the most sense. It has to work as an idea as well as being graphically valid. If I find I have to try too hard, or stretch too much, I forget it and try something else.”
- Camelot’s typefaces bring both the contemporary and historical to the table
- Scott Newett’s eerily quiet, ethereal portraits of Chinese utopia
- Jade Schulz’s atmospheric and imaginative editorial illustrations
- Emiliano Granado’s new zine puts a fresh spin on Tour de France fandom
- The big cover up: Mathieu Tremblin's translations of graffiti
- Artist Howard Fonda captures the vibrancy of summer for Ace & Tate
- Benedict Redgrove’s beautifully hypnotic film about how a tennis ball is created
- Tommy Cash subverts the tropes of rap videos with a fleshy celebration of the human body (NSFW)
- Ian Davis’ picturesque paintings of bureaucratic dystopia
- Is it ever OK to work for free?
- Pentagram unveils refresh of Mastercard’s brand mark and identity
- Peter Saville and Tate Design Studio create beer can artwork for Switch House pale ale