• Lw_2

    Portrait by Jeremy Liebman

  • Lw_3
  • Lw_4
Art

Issue #6: Lawrence Weiner Interview

Posted by Alex Moshakis,

It’s Nice That Issue #6 is released on Thursday. To celebrate, we’ll be sharing exclusive excerpts from a few of the magazine’s interviews and features throughout the week. The first snippet is taken from an exciting (and slightly intimidating, such is his articulacy) conversation with Lawrence Weiner. One of the foremost conceptual artists, Weiner has, since the 1960s, continued to explore and challenge the nature of art’s existence, its cultural status and its function…

It’s Nice That: You were on the road a lot when you were younger, and you worked a number of different jobs. How did you first come to be an artist?

Lawrence Weiner: That’s really quite simple. I was involved with civil rights at a very young age. And because of the economy at the time I had to find various jobs. Immediately I was interacting with a number of artists through whom I discovered an interest in art. As a kid, I would hit the bars at 4 o’clock in the morning because I worked at night, and I found these people who were involved in the same existential things that I was – the same things I had discovered from reading as a child in the South Bronx. Of course, the interesting thing for me was that I couldn’t pronounce anything. I pronounced Camus “Kǽməs”, not “Camoo”. But I learnt to understand. I found a group of older people – I mean quite old for a kid, a teenager – and I began to take part in these conversations.

I spent quite a bit of my youth deciding whether I was going to try to change the culture as a whole, or whether I was going to continue to try and change each individual horrendous thing that was going on in the world. Most artists are essentially outer-directed rather than inner-directed. There’s an old-fashioned, romantic idea that the artist has an urge inside, but if you have something you want to say, you simply look for a form to say it with. In my case, I could either say it with a baseball bat at a demonstration or I could say it by making something.

So how exactly did your first works come about? CRATERING PIECE, for example. This was in 1960, and involved you blowing things up in a national park, creating craters and calling them sculptures.

I’m still very pleased with that piece, but I was only 17 or 18 at the time and I misread what I was doing. I thought each individual explosion was an individual sculpture, and they weren’t. It was my means of creation at that moment, and it was a way of filling my means of anger, I guess, at the world. Art, I think, always comes from an anger with the specific configuration that’s presented to you. It’s not terribly intellectual. There is no deep down emotional attachment.

What’s interesting, in hindsight, is this quite drastic shift into painting. CRATERING PIECE was followed by the Propeller Series, a number of paintings which seem so different both in medium and intent.

I totally agree. It’s interesting because it’s a very, very long time ago, and I don’t remember if the intent was the same, although I believe I thought it was at the time. The Propeller paintings were taken from a television screen when it was closed off at night. There was a test pattern which, by chance, happened to look like a nuclear pattern. I guess the intent was the same – it was essentially an attempt to take an object and build that object into a form of meaning that had very little to do with the object itself. Now think of the times, think of my age. I was influenced by people like Jasper Johns – people basically trying to deal with putting content within the context of everyday life.

When did you start dismissing these more traditional notions of painting?

I don’t think I ever dismissed them. STATEMENTS, for example, the book I made when I first realised there was a problem with form, contains a lot of things that refer to the everyday life of a painter. I never really dismissed that life. My colleagues at the time included Robert Ryman, a painter, and I was friendly with many people who were making so-called paintings. I had nothing against painting, but it was no longer the means through which I could communicate to people. There’s no simpler way of putting it. We try to find our own syntax. It is the same in fashion. In fashion you are not rejecting something, but instead you’re trying to find a syntax that suits you better.

Read the full interview in It’s Nice That Issue #6, released on Thursday.
Portrait by Jeremy Liebman.

Portrait8

Posted by Alex Moshakis

Alex originally joined It’s Nice That as a designer but moved into editorial and oversaw the It’s Nice That magazine from Issue Six (July 2011) to Issue Eight (March 2012) before moving on that summer.

Most Recent: Art View Archive

  1. Karinhagen-itsnicethat-main

    Pottery has had a bit of a bad rep until recently when people have slowly begun to realise that it’s FUCKING BADDASS. The pottery world is creaking under the weight of the amount of thrill-seeking clay-spinners popping up all over the place making vessels for cool people to put their cacti and fennel seeds in, and so we thought we’d highlight a few people who are taking the clay world by storm. Think for a minute, if you will, how few kilns there are on this earth, and how many universities have in recent years completely shut down their ceramics department due to lack of funding and demand. Then get your head around how these guys manage to create such brilliant work at such an astonishing rate while still keeping up their day jobs. Seeing as pottery is well trendy right now, I thought I’d run down a list of my personal favourite pot-heads out there.

  2. Jr-newyorktimes-itsnicethat-list

    It’s always a joy when two creative forces we like collide and produce something that harnesses their collective talents. We’re huge fans of the team at The New York Times Magazine (so much so we interviewed design director Gail Bichler for the new issue of our Printed Pages magazine) and we love the work of JR, so the coming-together of the two was right up our street.

  3. List

    Have you ever wondered what the world might have looked like after the great Old Testament flood? What bizarre events might have followed such a freak occurrence in weather? Me neither. It’s honestly never crossed my mind. But illustrator Samuel Branton has been fixating on the idea, imagining the strange fusion of land and sea that a tumultuous rise in water levels might effect. He’s gone one step further and illustrated these fictional scenarios in miniature, taking this Regency medium and making it weird. Witness crabs beating up a wild boar, monkeys tossing an elephant in the air and a sad old sperm whale incapacitated in a tree. And Deluge is available in book form too!

  4. Aakash-itsnicethat-list

    When we last wrote about Aakash Nihalani we described his practice as a series of interventions, and now that he has graduated from playful street art compositions to full blown technological mind-blowers, that vaguery seems even more apt. His newest piece sees him create a series of interactive installations which respond to the movements of the subject stood in front of them. The video demonstrates it better than I could ever hope to, so wrap your eyes around it and try to keep your jaw off the floor. Aakash is entering a new age, people; just imagine the possibilities!

  5. Ines-longevial-itsnicethat-list

    Inès Longevial is an art director and illustrator based in Paris, whose beautiful paintings of intertwined bodies are likely to have you looking twice. She breaks up the human figure into segments in a fashion Picasso himself would admire, rendering different parts in contrasting but muted colour palettes to disguise the physicality of her subjects. The effect is quite beguiling; hands play across hips and colour distinctions hint at the seams of clothes, but nothing is clear cut. It’s a geometric play on anatomy, and it has clients including fashion brand Amélie Pichard and sportswear giants Nike coming back for more.

  6. Hannahwaldron-itsnicethat-list

    “I wish I knew how to weave,” I found myself sighing longingly while clicking through Hannah Waldron’s portfolio. The UK-based multi-disciplinary artist and designer has transitioned seamlessly from grid-based image-making to create works in textile form since completing an MFA in Textiles at Konstfack, Sweden, and it looks like she’s well at home in the medium. Map Tapestries is a series of woven works inspired by various city scenes – Kreuzberg, NYC and Venice, for example – in bright colours, evocative shapes and simple geometric forms, and it’s wonderful.

  7. Jen-stark-whirl-side-int-10

    If it isn’t broke then there’s absolutely no need to even think about fixing it, as artist Jen Stark is fully aware, and there’s nothing broken about her geometric papercut sculptures. The LA-based artist has been making such work for literally as long as It’s Nice That has been running – here’s the first time we ever posted about her, back in 2007 – and although her work continues to grow in intricacy, she’s stayed true to her roots. These days her sculptures are made more and more often inside huge, unassuming black and white boxes, recreating the feeling that you’re a child about to unbundle a giant parcel of joy on Christmas morning, and they’re still as impressive as they were eight years ago.

  8. Everybody-razzle-dazzle-1-photo-mark-mcnulty-int-list

    Sir Peter Blake has designed this fabulous dazzle ship, a Mersey Ferry that will carry commuter passengers for the next two years. Named Everybody Razzle Dazzle, Sir Peter says it’s his “largest artwork to date,” and that he was “honoured and excited to have been asked to design a dazzle image for the iconic Mersey Ferry.”

  9. Boyocollage-int-list

    Some budding young design talents fresh out of university might harbour resentment about being thrust into a new job at a design studio as a “photocopier boy” (his words), but Patrick Waugh is not one of them. Instead he took full advantage of the rich archive at his disposal in his earliest and most junior jobs to make copies. Lots of them. And then took a scalpel and some masking tape to them, and transformed them into something altogether more exciting.

  10. Stephenabela-int-main

    At first, Stephen Abela’s images are all glorious bronzed bodies, sun-drenched beaches and hazy holiday reveries. But beneath the heat, there’s something else at play too, which feels a little more disquieting. In that oft-cited Edward Hopper thing: even in the densely populated scenes there feels like there’s a loneliness. Even the speech bubbles are lonely – in fact, they’re vacant – suggesting that for all the beautiful scenery, the folk that populate it aren’t quite sure what to say or what to do. There’s a joy there, for sure, but the great thing about Stephen’s work is this complexity, and the sense that all isn’t necessarily as it seems.

  11. Int-list-carsten-holler-pic

    Merging the fun of the playground with the beauty and cerebral qualities of art, a slide will transport visitors to the Hayward Gallery entrance this summer thanks to the forthcoming Carsten Höller show, Decision.

  12. Traceyemin-mybed-int-

    Sometimes I don’t really “get” modern art, but I get Tracey Emin’s My Bed. She displayed it as a piece of art in 1998 after practically living in it for about a month following a bad breakup. Back then she was rake-thin and impish with an appetite for booze and fags, in that odd age where you’re left to fend for yourself but are not perhaps quite ready.

  13. Serenmorganjones-int-list

    With the centenary of British women receiving the partial vote coming up shortly, artist Seren Morgan Jones decided it was time to focus on the Welsh suffragists who helped to make it happen. “I think it is important to show that there is more to Wales and its history than coal mining, rugby and men,” she explains, “and to draw people’s attention to the fact Welsh women were so involved in the fight for women’s rights.”