• Opinion-lead

    The Misunderstood Intersection Between Advertising and Design

Opinion

Opinion: The Misunderstood Intersection Between Advertising and Design

Posted by It's Nice That,

This week Michael Ian Kaye, the creative director and partner of Mother New York and Thomas Kemeny explain what design and advertising could and should be learning from each other. As ever you can add your thoughts using the thread below…

Design is an iterative process and in the many iterations of recreating myself as a designer, I somehow found myself at an ad agency.

My first gig out of school was at a book publisher designing insides and eventually covers. A book cover served the higher purpose of literature, but also offered the opportunity to bring great design to the masses. Oddly, in some ways book covers were my first ads. They had to be illustrative and reductive, conveying a simple message with strong conceptual underpinnings.

Since then I’ve cautiously inched my design background deep into the branding world. I now run the design group at Mother New York, a company known for advertising.

I know I’m supposed to think an impossible rift exists between advertising and design, but in many ways we are similar. We both seek to create objects of meaning, we desire to be culturally relevant and we want people to see and appreciate what we do. The tension comes from a misunderstanding in our approach to achieving this goal.

Advertising offered me the opportunity to elevate the broader visual vocabulary and consciousness of aesthetics to a greater number of people. Advertising’s scale and reach gives it an implied importance, even when it doesn’t deserve it. Without reach, design runs the risk of getting smaller and smaller, talking only to a select group and becoming increasingly insulated and isolated.

“We both seek to create objects of meaning, we desire to be culturally relevant and we want people to see and appreciate what we do. The tension comes from a misunderstanding in our approach to achieving this goal.”

Michael Ian Kaye and Thomas Kemeny

As designers we are trained in creating enduring objects. Design to us is a process of distilling something down to its core essence. It’s not an end result. Not a thing you can copy and paste. Not a “pretty” filter in Photoshop. The process of design is what designers bring to advertising, especially when brought into projects early on. It’s a way of approaching advertising and communications with a sense of permanence. It’s a way of making the brand and the product one and the same.

Advertising tends to aim for disruption and temporal meaning. It can live on, but its purpose is to drive action in the moment, with permanence praised in hindsight rather than as an intended goal. Design can help the disruptive advertising story fit comfortably with the product story. Without it, work runs the risk of feeling tangential, fluffy or superficial.

Design begins with opening every door to see where an idea fits. It’s knowing what’s to the left, what’s to the right and what’s behind and ahead, giving firm grounding of where you are standing. It’s about setting the spectrum you want to explore in range and mood.

Advertising sees fitting in as failure. You look to the unknown for ideas. You search inward rather than outward for context. You try and stretch as far from the category and product as possible while still being connected. It is less about exploring all the different doors and where they lead and more about finding ones that can serve the function you need now.

Advertising is fleeting. It moves and inspires action in the moment, then changes. It shocks and surprises. It’s visceral. Design creates objects that are enduring. They can live on forever, adapting and evolving from their roots. Design codifies and clarifies. It’s meticulous. Advertising is far-reaching. Design is intimate and close.

“We exist in overlapping worlds, yet we often lack regard for each other, perhaps because we’re measuring the other by our own values. Yet without these differences design would stay small and breakthrough advertising could feel hollow.”

Michael Ian Kaye and Thomas Kemeny

Designers at their worst see advertising as corporate flash that is below them, attempting to bury the advertising idea in the aesthetic. At their best, designers seek to become part of the ideating process and provide longevity.

Advertising creatives at their worst see design as icing on the idea, bringing designers in at the end of the process to make things pretty. At their best, creatives see designers as collaborators that can bring depth and integrity to the work, knowing that a tight design connection gives the opportunity to stretch further conceptually.

We exist in overlapping worlds, yet we often lack regard for each other, perhaps because we’re measuring the other by our own values. Yet without these differences design would stay small and breakthrough advertising could feel hollow.
We will never be the same department – nor should we be. But sharing a roof puts the opposing viewpoint at our disposal, tempering an arrogant extremism and letting us focus where our passions lie.

Advertising paired with design offers broad exposure to something significant, pinning a lasting ideal in a single moment. It’s a beautiful partnership. Together, we can bring thoughtful design to the masses and turn ads into lasting objects of value.

comments powered by Disqus
Nice

Posted by It's Nice That

The It’s Nice That byline is used on posts that relate to the site in general, specific announcements or pieces where there is no clear single author. Contact us using the email address below if you have questions, feedback or complaints.

Most Recent: Opinion View Archive

  1. List

    Last week features editor Liv Siddall put out a call to arms to the illustration community, inviting practitioners young and old to push their discipline further and keep their work exciting and fresh. She cited in particular the regurgitation of the same established names at illustration fairs and events as a cynical way to flog tickets and boost sales instead of creating a platform for new, innovative work.

  2. Main

    This week, Features Editor Liv Siddall wonders whether the world of illustration, and the events that champion them, have perhaps become a bit stale. And maybe we should take steps to champion as many new and exciting artists as possible, as opposed to falling back on the same names time and time again.

  3. List

    This week Rob Alderson welcomes the excellent Dazed 100 list of defining creative pioneers but wonders why readers are being asked to help rank the entries. As ever you can join the debate using the comment thread below….

  4. Opinion-list-new

    This week It’s Nice That director Will Hudson talks about why he reckons the new Randall Wright-directed documentary Hockney is so brilliant. You can let us know your thoughts in the comment thread below.

  5. Opinion-list

    This week assistant editor Maisie Skidmore asks what it is about weekly podcast Serial that has got the whole world talking. As ever, we want to hear what you think! Add your two pennies in the comment thread below.

  6. List

    This week Rob Alderson examines Paper Magazine’s attempts to “break the internet” with their nude Kim Kardashian photoshoot. He asks if it’s actually a good cover, and what (if anything) it tells us about the magazine industry. As ever you can add your thoughts below…

  7. List

    Ahead of a panel discussion we’re hosting at London College of Communication next week we’re keen to explore whether the gap between design schools and the creative industries is a problem that needs addressing. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  8. List

    In a special Opinion piece, Rob Alderson explains why the closure of London’s Kemistry Gallery is a cause for concern, but why its ambitious future plans need to be encouraged. You can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  9. Lead

    This week online editor Emily Gosling looks at who can really claim authorship of artworks created using technology designed by someone else. Who can really take the credit for art that might not be possible without the tech know-how of others?

  10. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on an interesting blog by Chloe Markowicz which suggests that people are ashamed to call what they do advertising. As ever you can join the debate and add your comments using the discussion thread below.

  11. Main

    Wake up! Freshers’ Week is done – all that colourful IKEA kitchenware your mum got you is nowhere to be seen and you’ve gained 478 new friends on Facebook and an awkward conversation with your home friends about who you’re actually going to Glastonbury with next year. To be honest, being a fresher usually goes on for way longer than a week. After a month or so of partying and drinking Glenn’s Vodka and Robinson’s out of tupperware bowls you wake up with a whole load of briefs to tackle and studio space and equipment to fight over. This is the START of ART SCHOOL.

  12. List

    In recent months the question of so-called spec work has been raised with us over social media in light of various design competitions we have helped promote. Off the back of that we have spent a lot of time discussing this thorny issue with various people so as to formulate a consistent approach, although the nature of these things is that each is best analysed on a case by case basis.

  13. List

    This week Rob Alderson reflects on the launch of the new Design Museum website and the strange suggestion that the redesign should have been given to a British agency rather than Dutch studio Fabrique. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below…