• Opiniontoo

    Opinion: Madeleine Morley speaks of the worryingly short shelf-life of online content

Opinion

Opinion: Madeleine Morley speaks of the worryingly short shelf-life of online content

Posted by Madeleine Morley,

This week our Editorial Assistant Madeleine Morley reflects on her four weeks at It’s Nice That but wonders if the fast turnover of creative content online is really a good thing. Whether you agree or disagree, feel free to join in the conversation below.

I’ve been at It’s Nice That for roughly four weeks now, and during my time here I have come across some of the most interesting, inspiring work that I’ve ever seen. In search for content, I’ve travelled to many strange corners of the Internet, and I have come across artists and publications that are pushing boundaries in the most innovative and thought-provoking ways.

What I have found strange about my constant hunt for content, and what I have noticed on my countless explorations of blogs and e-zines and Tumblr pages, is the sheer amount of new material that is flagged up on each of the millions of sites, every single day. I find it overwhelming. It is difficult to consume all the information, and to engage with each new, wonderful thing to the extent that it deserves.

Some of the the content that I’ve stumbled across is making provocative points, and deserves time and thought to fully appreciate. I think of the things that have made me who I am, the songs that I listened to as a teenager, which I spent so much time scrutinizing over. The time spent with these songs allowed them to become part of the fabric of my personality: without this time, the things I love wouldn’t have sunk into my sensibility.

The speed of content turnover that the Internet demands doesn’t allow for lingering, so it feels impossible for the art to develop a meaningful place in our minds

The speed of content turnover that the Internet demands doesn’t allow for lingering, so it feels impossible for the art to develop a meaningful place in our minds. Material has such a quick sell-by date and lasts for 24 hours at the longest, and then it falls off, it is pushed out, tumbling back into the abyss that it was originally fished out from, by people like me on their content expeditions. Perhaps the new context for all this information is actually speed, not absorption, and I need to embrace this. But I still can’t quite get over the idea that whilst a quick fix of images is great and gets inspiration flowing, critical thinking and contemplation is vital, in order to fuel debate and let one artist’s view of the world flow and enrich and maybe even change yours.

The speed in which I have written this article, and then the speed in which the article will be read, and then the fact that the article will both stick around forever at the same time as being completely forgotten, is something I find interesting. To write in such a way feels organic and freeing and unhinged, at the same time as being nerve wracking because I know this will stick around, but not really, because it will just become amassed with all the other posts from the past. I find this change in the way we write and think about writing fascinating. Debating whether the speed demanded by the internet is a good thing or bad thing is perhaps not the point, rather we need to carefully consider what might be happening to our minds as an effect of the turnover of content and writing, and how the changes might be effecting our aesthetic judgement.

With online content, it feels like we’re often racing ahead, eager to know what’s next, instead of letting the intricate, subtle parts of an idea soak in. It’s astonishing to live in a world where all this endless art and illustration and information is available at our fingertips, but without context, does it mean anything other than simply being a way of passing the time?

comments powered by Disqus
Oo-xtcya

Posted by Madeleine Morley

Madeleine joined It’s Nice That as a freelance editorial assistant in May 2014 having graduated from Cambridge University where she edited the student newspaper. In the autumn of 2014 she will begin her Masters course at The Courtauld Institute of Art where she will specialise in architecture.

Most Recent: Opinion View Archive

  1. Opinion-list

    In the wake of the launch of Printed Pages Autumn 2014, Editor James Cartwright wonders and worries about the secret of designing a great magazine cover and asks for any handy hints you might have. Do him a favour and add your thoughts in the comments section below.

  2. Main

    In light of New York Fashion Week’s main event, a star-studded play put on by Opening Ceremony entitled 100% Lost Cotton, the It’s Nice That team began to ponder their own individual dream play, and what that would look like if they were given the chance to direct it. The results are pretty weird to be honest, but you can’t deny the appeal of each and every one in its own way.

  3. Main

    This week Editor Liv Siddall addresses the world’s distraught reaction to the announcement that MSN Messenger will terminate after 15 years in operation, and wonders if we should get so nostalgic and wet-eyed over technology.

  4. Main

    This week editorial assistant Amy Lewin ponders the cultural impact of the potential England/Scotland split. As ever, feel free to leave comments below.

  5. Main

    We’ve been posting music-related art and design articles on It’s Nice That since the very beginning. In fact the first music video ever posted on It’s Nice That is this one by Koichiro Tsujikawa back in May 2007. Since then we’ve covered countless festival posters and identities, record sleeves, band logos, ad campaigns and tour photography amongst pretty much every other kind of music-related content you can think of, barring only reviewing music itself.

  6. Opinion-list

    This week editor James Cartwright wonders whether it was right to remove the Chapman Brothers’ controversial sculpture Piggyback from a Roman gallery or whether it’s an affront to creative freedoms. As ever your comments are welcome below…

  7. List

    Last week we were duped into running a project on the site that turned out to be a hoax. Here Rob Alderson explains what happened and why it’s left an unsavoury taste, while James Cartwright disagrees and congratulates the artist on a spoof well done. As ever you can leave your thoughts using the discussion thread below…

  8. List

    Two weeks ago we featured DesignStudio’s Airbnb logo. One week ago copywriter Rob Mitchell of We All Need Words wrote an Opinion piece calling for an end to convoluted brand stories. His article was cheered by some people and incensed others; Sam Peskin and Liam Hamill of VentureThree want to have their say and defend brand strategy. Again you can add your views using the comment thread below…

  9. List

    We were pretty impressed with the new Airbnb logo when it launched last week, but for a different perspective, here’s Rob Mitchell from We All Need Words. He tells us why he’s had enough of “over-cooked brand stories masquerading as strategy” and as ever you can add your thoughts below…

  10. List

    In light of our recent changes and the launch of the new-look Design Observer, Rob Alderson reflects on design websites’ redesigns. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below, and we’re particularly keen to hear what you’re making of our new look!

  11. List

    This week James Cartwright wonders what the V&A is up to with its policy of “Rapid Response Collecting” and whether it really marks a shift in their curation policy. As ever you can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below.

  12. List

    This week Rob Alderson considers the aftermath of the disastrous Robin Thicke Twitter Q&A and wonders how it was ever signed off when what was going to happen seemed entirely predictable. As ever you can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below.

  13. Opinion-list

    This week assistant editor Maisie Skidmore asks what makes a good group show. Are they really all they’re cracked up to be, or are they poised for failure? Tell us what you think of them and which you’ve been to that were especially brilliant or terrible in the comments section below.