• Top

    Help us out – what makes a great creative conference?

Opinion

Opinion: Help us out – what makes a great creative conference?

Posted by Rob Alderson,

This week Rob Alderson poses a few questions in a bid to get to the bottom of what makes an inspirational and unforgettable creative conference. As ever you can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below.

Over the last couple of years my colleagues and I have been to creative conferences in all shapes and sizes, in different countries and continents and in different capacities: press, speaker and delegate. From three-day events like Design Indaba in Cape Town and Dublin’s OFFSET, to one-day affairs like the Wired Conference and The Modern Magazine via QVED, What Design Can Do, Typo London, POINT, AGI and Facing Pages, we’ve been treated to a bundle of great experiences.

We run our own conference as well of course, and with Here 2014 just over 10 weeks away we thought it would be good to explore what our readers see as the do’s and don’ts of such events.

Here’s six posers designed to get the debate started:

1. How long should talks be?

This varies enormously from event to event; ranging from short, sharp sessions to in-depth hour-long slots. There have been times when the end of a talk seems frustratingly premature and we’ve been left gagging for more, but there have also been those which have seemed ramblingly interminable. Where is the sweet spot here? How tight does the brief need to be? What if you still hanker for more? Which brings us onto…

2. What value questions at the end?

For the past two years we have not had any Q&A at Here, and when we look through the feedback forms this is mentioned as some people’s biggest complaint, and other’s biggest compliment. Great debate is always to be encouraged and conversation on all platforms in the modern age should be two-way wherever possible. But we have all squirmed during a long, incoherent, aggressive or grandstanding question from the floor. And despite witnessing multiple attempts to glean questions via social media, I have never seen this really work well.

3. What makes a good panel discussion?

I like it when conferences mix up the format with panel discussions and it’s often a great way to change the pace. At OFFSET these only happen on the second and third stages, but at AGI some of the biggest names taking part faced off in a Roundheads vs Cavaliers discussion about modernism in graphic design (think Sagmeister, Bantjes, and the like). But what factors make good panel talks? A strong host? A focused discussion? Dissenting but not ego-driven voices?

4. How important is the right mix?

We are big believers in eclecticism and think there’s a real value in having all kinds of creatives on the same bill. But I also think it’s important that there is a mix of experience on stage too. Of course you want big names but it’s also exciting to see people you didn’t know too much about previously. And it’s also nice to have speakers who don’t present essentially the same talk at every event; however uplifting and inspiring that talk may be.

5. How, if at all, can delegated be encouraged to mingle?

We’ve all been to dinner parties where the well-meaning hosts have planned ice-breaker games; sometimes it can be really fun, sometimes it’s toe-curling. But while we don’t want to force delegates to mix, most people there will have something in common, probably a creative background or set of art and design interests. It seems a real shame if you can potentially sit next to someone all day without realising they are the collaborator you have been looking for.

6. What make s a good venue?

From slick conference halls to atmospheric theatres, rooms that fit a few hundred to auditoriums which seat more than 2,000 people, we’ve seen them all. But what makes a great venue? Comfy seats, good WIFI and enough power sockets always make a difference. But what about ambiance, intimacy, transport connections and staff?

So now it’s your turn; what makes a good creative conference as far as you’re concerned?

comments powered by Disqus
Ra

Posted by Rob Alderson

Editor-in-Chief Rob oversees editorial across all three It’s Nice That platforms; online, print and events. He has a background in newspaper journalism and a particular interest in art, advertising and photography. He is the main host of the Studio Audience podcast.

Most Recent: Opinion View Archive

  1. List

    We were pretty impressed with the new Airbnb logo when it launched last week, but for a different perspective, here’s Rob Mitchell from We All Need Words. He tells us why he’s had enough of “over-cooked brand stories masquerading as strategy” and as ever you can add your thoughts below…

  2. List

    In light of our recent changes and the launch of the new-look Design Observer, Rob Alderson reflects on design websites’ redesigns. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below, and we’re particularly keen to hear what you’re making of our new look!

  3. List

    This week James Cartwright wonders what the V&A is up to with its policy of “Rapid Response Collecting” and whether it really marks a shift in their curation policy. As ever you can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below.

  4. List

    This week Rob Alderson considers the aftermath of the disastrous Robin Thicke Twitter Q&A and wonders how it was ever signed off when what was going to happen seemed entirely predictable. As ever you can add your thoughts using the discussion thread below.

  5. Opinion-list

    This week assistant editor Maisie Skidmore asks what makes a good group show. Are they really all they’re cracked up to be, or are they poised for failure? Tell us what you think of them and which you’ve been to that were especially brilliant or terrible in the comments section below.

  6. Main

    This week online editor Liv Siddall wonders if anyone actually enjoys the huge amount of wacky summertime events that are on offer in London. As always your comments and opinions are welcome below.

  7. Main

    This week, editor Liv Siddall gets excited about the upcoming ELCAF festival in London, and tells you all sternly why YES it is very important that we keep going to live events surrounding graphic arts and comics.

  8. Top

    This week Nat Hunter, director of design at The Royal Society for the Encouragement of the Arts (RSA) and a trustee of D&AD, welcomes awards being given to projects that make a real difference. It might mark, she believes, a fundamental shift in the design world. As ever you can add your thoughts using the comment thread below.

  9. Main

    This week our Editorial Assistant Madeleine Morley reflects on her four weeks at It’s Nice That but wonders if the fast turnover of creative content online is really a good thing. Whether you agree or disagree, feel free to join in the conversation below.

  10. Main1

    This week Apple turned down an application for an app that promotes female masturbation on the grounds that it’s inappropriate. Liv Siddall wonders whether, despite the criticism over the design of the app, that was really the issue here. As always, get involved with your own comments below.

  11. Opinion

    This week Rob Alderson looks at actors who were too good-looking for the roles they played and asks Hollywood to give viewers a bit more credit. As ever you can join the discussion below.

  12. Main

    Two years ago when this Opinion feature started, Rob Alderson wrote a piece about the rampant rise of the “must-see” culture; shows which the media’s frenzy makes you feel like you have to go and see. Hands up who found themselves queuing for the Bowie show at the V&A without knowing much more about him than just the chorus to Life on Mars? Me. Who queued bottom-to-crotch in the rain with about 1,000 grumpy pensioners to catch a glimpse of Hockney’s A Bigger Picture at the Royal Academy? Also me.

  13. List

    We really enjoyed this year’s Pick Me Up festival (as you can see from our glowing review) but others were not so convinced. Here Lawrence Zeegen, dean of design at the London College of Communications, argues that the graphic art world needs a wake-up call.